77 - The Recollection

Greetings, this evening of your time, as you create time. How are you all? [Great!] Oh, thank you very much.

We will begin this interaction, this evening of your time, with the entitlement, “The Recollection”, and, shall we say, this will pertain to what we will label your creation of time.

For, understand, you are infinite, eternal, and multidimensional beings. And this means, in the truest sense of the word, Eternal, that you have no beginning. You have no, therefore, middle or ending in the overall sense of your being.

However, within that infinity, within that totality, there are many diverse ways that you express your beingness. And one of those ways, just one, is in this particular reality you call the ‘physical reality’, within which there is, shall we say, to some degree, an agreement between beings to create the notion of the unfoldment of the forgetting and subsequent remembering of before, during, and after. And this, in a sense, again, is agreed upon by all individuals in a reality in terms of synchronizing that creation according to a certain rate, according to a certain timing.

Now you, as a society, are in that sense, agreeing to be synchronized in time-stream. So, with, shall we say, minor individual variations, you generally, as a society, experience time in a similar fashion.

Now, very often, even during your, shall we say, day-to-day reality, you may, in that sense, shall we say, create time in a slightly different flow. Perhaps less of it, which you then perceive ‘time flies by’; or perhaps more of it, you perceive then that ‘time is dragging along’.

But it is your creation, and there is the standardization, to some degree, between all individuals within a given mass consciousness in a society. Our particular society is also, to some degree, synchronized to itself, in that we still, to some degree, create time.

Our relationship to that time, and our experience of that time, is far different. However, we still do create it, and there still is a rate, or a flow, at which we synchronize with each other for some degree of a common experience.

We have spoken to your society many times about the fact that we exist in a different dimension of experience and that this is why you would not, at this time, physically perceive our star without, shall we say, a few adjustments in that dimension.

What we have not often shared is one of, shall we say, the nature, or the natures, of that difference in dimensionality. And although this, to some degree, will have particular extensions into our physicality — which we will not discuss at this time — one of the, shall we say, more obvious differences that, in a sense, has us existing in a different dimension that is not synchronized to yours, and therefore, in that sense, does not allow us to physically perceive each other without the adjustments, is the fact that our particular stream of time in, shall we say, reference to your own, in comparison to your own, is approximately, and this is, again, quite arbitrary, quite approximate, but ten times faster than your own. Therefore, what you perceive to be, in that sense, thirty years of the passage of your time, would translate into our history to approximately three hundred years of time.

So, therefore, without a synchronization, there simply would be no sense to be made from one dimension of experience to another, such as the difference in the experience and creation of time itself.

When we, in that sense, interact with you, we do so from our particular relative stream of time, so it may seem to us that simply days have passed, but, in a sense, it is synchronized when we interact with you to your time stream as to seem to make some type of sense to you, and to seem to have some continuity, in that sense, from one interaction to another. But it is not necessarily the one-to-one relationship that you might imagine.

For instance, you will perceive many times that we have had, for instance, four or five particular discrete interactions, but from my end, we may, in that sense, perceive them as one, shall we say, interaction. So there will not always be a one-to-one correspondence, though we can tap into where and when our communications are coming through to you and make some kind of logistical sense to it in your terms — before, during and after other sessions. So, therefore, again, even this is quite an arbitrary creation.

But allow us to move on to your creation of time. We will use the following analogy: you have what you call to be a theory you call your Big Bang, and what this represents, from our perspective, is the intersection of, shall we say, Consciousness Itself, which is transcendental, and physical reality itself. That intersection, the point at which they meet, so to speak, creates a spark.

And in that sense, initially speaking, that spark will be perceived in a particular given space of physical reality as initially ‘nothing’, and then perhaps you can say ‘something’, but ‘one something’. Now, again, this is all quite colloquial and is more for the purposes of analogy than direct, precise information. But simply follow along and you will understand the analogy.

First of all, again, allow us to extend the definition that even your society, even your physicists, shall we say, are understanding that space and time, formerly believed to be two discrete ideas, are simply two sides of the same coin and even in your science is now labeled ‘space-time’, rather than simply each individual component. Understand that this makes sense, for in order, or shall we say, with the creation of space, then comes the necessity of time, so to speak, to transverse it, to be able to make some sense out of it.

And this is one of the, shall we say, presentations that time itself will represent. So, following on of the analogy of a singular point, at that singular point, at the time, shall we say, of its manifestation, there is no time, for there is simply one point. There is no, shall we say, space to cover, nowhere to go, nothing to do.

So therefore, there is not the need for the creation of time to do it in. But when, in that sense, that one point does, in a sense, again as an analogy, explode out to, shall we say, many billions and billions of separate ideas — shall we say, radiating out 360 degrees in all directions — you then, from that center-ness, from that singular point, begin to create between that singular point and the point of dispersion, space. Space from a point to another point.

And as, in that sense, you create more space, also is simultaneously the creation of time itself. Again, perhaps, colloquially speaking, you can say, time in which to traverse the space itself. Obviously, if everything is all one idea, there is, again, no necessity for time.

But the moment there is a single separation, the moment there is a single divergence from a single point, there is then the necessity within realities that contain this idea of time. Is this clear so far? [Yes!]

Now, understand, as you separate from the one in the aforementioned analogy, you create more space, and you create more time, and you also then, by definition, create more separation. Therefore, allow us to now, shall we say, bring this analogy home, so to speak.

We have discussed with you many times the idea of ‘limitation-separation’ and also of ‘limitlessness and integration’. In that sense, were you using the, again, aforementioned analogy of Big Bang, to begin to contract the points back to the center you would then correspondingly create less space, so to speak, between the points and therefore less time necessary to, shall we say, extend to each point.

This will directly relate to your life, to your personal, shall we say, experience. For as you are exploring separation, limitation, you are, in that sense, creating more space. The more separations you create from who you choose to be, the more time, in that sense, you then need create to experience those separations, to experience each discrete idea as a separate idea. So, therefore, as you embark upon your reality from the perspective of separation and limitation, you automatically create more time to do so.

Therefore, you will always have, shall we say, colloquially speaking, enough time to explore each and every minute corner of each and every minute separation that you have created.

Now, this works in the inverse way or the opposite way as well. For as you begin to represent who you are and understand that you create your reality 100%… 100%… what that 100% means is that everything in that reality, 100% of everything fits. 100% of everything is your creation.

As you begin to act upon this knowledge in the way that you begin to use these creations, you integrate them one at a time. And in the integration, it is as if, again, the many points are contracting back to the center point.

The more you allow everything in your reality to deliver the message in a positive way that you have created it to deliver, the less time you then need to create.

So, therefore, remembering that these creations were made by you — perhaps from unconscious beliefs in your past before you knew you had a choice, before you knew you could consciously choose your beliefs — there may be some, shall we say, you sometimes refer to it as ‘extra baggage’ to, in that sense, incorporate.

It seems like extra baggage. But the idea is that it is not, that it is part of who you are. And that, in a sense, you can open those suitcases and repack the content within you, which is the taking of the many parts and integrating them back into the whole.

Therefore, an attitude of separation is an attitude of creating more time to experience those separations.

An attitude of integration begins, in that sense, to allow everything to come back to center. Begins to allow the space between the many fragmentations that you present as your discreet physical personality to decrease.

Thereby, again, decreasing the time necessary to explore each and every one of them. So, therefore, as you do acknowledge perhaps the creations created unconsciously, created from unpreferred beliefs, and use them in a positive way, use them to nail down the foundational primary beliefs that still limit you, acknowledge those beliefs, decide, after acknowledging and appreciating what they have allowed you to do and served you, to choose the new preferred belief, acting as though you already have the new preferred belief, you integrate the separations, one at a time.

You integrate the space in the totality of your consciousness that then necessitates ‘time’, in that sense, to experience them.

And as you begin to own your reality, acknowledge your reality, express gratitude for the creations that you had formerly labeled negative, but obviously that also contained the jewels of positivity and self-reflection, you begin to, literally, change the rate of your creation of time in, perhaps, what you can say relative terms, to the creation of time of your society as a whole. And sometimes, again, to use the analogy, you simply then begin to perceive that time is flying by quite quickly.

But again we remind you, when you say “time has flown by for I have had a good time”, it is not truly that time has passed any faster. In fact, because in having a good time, quote-unquote, you are being fully who you are, you are expressing less of the separation. And therefore, in that integrated state of awareness, literally creating less time.

So if one or two hours has passed by your mass consciousness clock time, and you have seen to experience only 20 or 25 minutes, your body and your consciousness, so to speak, mentality, have only aged the 25 or 30 minutes.

So therefore, obviously, you can see that this would have far-reaching effects on your physical body itself. This is why your life spans begin to increase when you begin to honor and validate who you are by beginning to grant the validity to the things, with integrity, that move you, that give you passion, that excite you. For they are representative of who you are. They are representative of your willingness to act as an integrated whole, rather than separate parts collecting each and every part back together, which can take a long time.

Do not worry, you will make all the time you need to do so.

But what we are suggesting is that should you wish to experience to create time at a flow that represents your integration, your physical age, your physical life span will increase. And understand now, that even if you are to define that your physical life span is 100 of your years, from our particular understanding of your physiognomy, this is but one third of the potential of the life spans of the body that you create. For 300 years is, in and of itself, the possible, shall we say, amount of time that your bodies can live.

And your, shall we say, reaching but one third of that is a direct result of your style of creation of time. If you are spending, shall we say, a majority of that one third of the time in misery, in self-denial of your creations, you seem, in that sense, to create, shall we say, the two or three hundred years worth of the passage of time. But, in a sense, because that is not synchronized to your particular society, you seem, in that sense, shall we say, to only have lived the hundred years, or perhaps quite a bit less in some instances.

But understand that this is all there is to it. And your willingness to stop denying your creations as — “Why is this happening to me? Poor me! What will I do? What did I ever do to deserve that miserable thing?” — that is a perspective. That is an approach. That is an attitude.

Now, in a sense, we are making light of it in order, in that sense, to allow you to enjoy these interactions. Understand that we are not criticizing it when we do so. But simply, sometimes members of your society seem, in that sense, to appreciate that particular approach of hearing, perhaps you can say, how it sounds from a third person's point of view, but we are not making fun of you.

And we are not saying that what you are doing is any worse qualitatively than what we are suggesting, but simply, having some fun in the course of communicating these ideas to you. But understand that when you do that, you remove your ability to use your creation. For, if you deny it — “Why is this happening to me?” — you are not looking at it as your creation and then cannot treat it and transform it as your creation. You approach it as an ‘external’ idea.

When you simply understand, “Well, alright, alright, alright. Here is a creation that I have created. But it is not one that I prefer. So, therefore, I am not looking at it as my creation. Were I to simply assume that, because I created all — this is not the one exception — were I to assume that this is my creation, I would understand that anything I create, no matter how it looks, contains both potentials for positive and negative manifestation. So, therefore, since I know I created it, and I know, on some level, as I create levels, what I am doing, I will simply approach it from the perspective, “How does it serve me, the way that it is presenting? Not if it was this, if it was that, but exactly the way it is.” When you do that, when you simply shift your perspective one minute bit to this particular perspective, you then give yourself, shall we say, one of the only chances to integrate it, rather than deny it.

Denial is continued separation. Denial is the pushing or partitioning of parts within you.

Acknowledgement, acting from the acknowledgement, is integration itself. It is the glue of unconditional love within you that allows you to collect back what you have formerly labeled separations within you, allows you to re-collect yourself into a discrete, singular being with a singular, integrated presentation and experience.

Therefore, what we are sharing with you as ‘the recollection’ is on the one hand the recollection of this information that we are sharing, which you already know on some level or you would simply not understand a word that I am saying, but also the literal recollection or re-collection of what you have denied within you.

When you talk about a subconscious closet, not the subconscious, shall we say, portion of your consciousness that allows for the automatic, shall we say, pilot of your body and so forth, but the closet that you stuff things into, so to speak. What allows the stuffing and filling of this closet is denial itself. When you deny something, it does not go away, for again, you are all of creation. There is nowhere to hide it. There is nowhere to put it. There is no outside. So, you tuck it, so to speak, again colloquially, into a closet you call ‘the subconscious’, shall we say, portion of your subconscious, that is, as a closet, or perhaps a dungeon.

But, understand, you can smash the lock from that dungeon. You can thrust open that dungeon door and one at a time acknowledge your creations, but not from the perspective of “why me?”, but from the perspective of, “Alright, I now understand that this is a creation that resulted from an unconscious belief that I no longer prefer, but I wish to acknowledge it. I wish to see what the belief is because I know I cannot change it unless I first see it, unless I first own it.”

So, calling forth, shall we say, members of the dungeon allows, shall we say, things to come to the surface so that you may now reinterpret them in an integrative way.

Now, perhaps at first, perhaps at first, it may seem a little overwhelming if you, shall we say, open the door all the way. So, therefore, feel free, if you wish to use the analogy of a door, to simply crack it and at least allow things, a bit at a time, to seep out. If you deny those things, worry not. They will be put back in the closet and you will get a chance to look at them later. But, if in that sense you acknowledge them, you will slowly empty out the closet and perhaps, eventually, shut it down.

But, it is up to you. The creations you stuff back in the closet, however, have a particular tendency that you, in your particular perspective label ‘disturbing’. That particular tendency is the harder and farther you push them into the closet — because they are your creations, because they are part of you, because you cannot truly deny anything about yourself — the louder they will knock, the more they will rattle their chains, the more they will bang on the walls, and the more, in that sense, you will be aware of them.

So, your willingness to simply invite them, one by one, as your children, rather than your prisoners, will enable you to see why you created these children, how they serve you, what it is they allow you to discover about yourself that you can use and transform yourself in a positive way. And, we remind you, there is absolutely nothing — unless your definition says that there is, there is — absolutely nothing that you can find out about yourself, no matter as you say ‘how awful’, that you cannot use in a positive way. Are you willing to approach it from that perspective, you can use it in a positive way.

So, there is no need to fear anything in the closet from the perspective of using it, from the perspective of its negative interpretation, we understand the fear and intrepidation. But, from the perspective of what it has to offer, this is a different perspective. And, this is what allows the symbols to deliver a message that you can use in a positive way.

When you call forth an idea from your subconscious closet, acknowledge it, appreciate it. It may be outdated, it may be obsolete, but appreciate that it has led you to this point, and choose anew with eyes open, having equalized it, it does not go back into the closet. It integrates into your totality. It becomes a part of you that is no better or no worse. It has no less or more weight than anything else. But, because you are choosing a positive perspective, the negative aspects of it will simply be irrelevant.

Remember, you contain it all. And, if you are creating a reality, as you are of positive and negative, you contain all of both.

So, it is not a matter of ever escaping the negative. It is part of you, for it is a polarized expression of the reality itself. But, when you choose, as an intention, a positive perspective, that negativity becomes irrelevant to the experience of your life. So, awareness of it you may have, but you will never experience one drop of the negativity.

Your awareness of the negativity, because you are, again, in a world that contains that negativity, will come in the form of the awareness of, quote-unquote, negative things, quote-unquote, happening to other individuals. And, from your perspective, you will understand that that is not negative that is happening to them, but you will understand that they are interpreting it as negative, therefore creating the negative experience.

Therefore, you will, perhaps, again, still perceive negativity, but not experience it at all. And, again, in that particular vein, we remind you, you can think anything you wish.

It is not the thinking of something positive which gives a positive reality.

It is not the thinking of something negative which gives a negative reality.

The thinking, shall we say, strata of your being is simply the library. And, in that sense, you can read any book you wish. Scary, happy, angry, sad, miserable, ecstatic. You can read them all, but the ones you check out are the ones that are your life, for the ones you check out are the ones that you act on. And, it is the actions that you take, and the books, to continue the analogy that you have read at the manual, for those actions which determine the reality.

So, if you do not act with the negative perspective, you can never — did he say never? I think he did [laughter] — never get a negative experience.

Only can you experience a negative experience if you first interpret it that way, assign that meaning, and then act with that interpretation and negative attitude.

Then, yes, you may experience things that you will find very simple to label ‘negative’, but it works the other way around. And, as you begin to use them in a positive way, all your creations, you also change the rate and flow of your creation of time.

Therefore, it's about time that you perhaps began to look, and to invite, and to embrace anything that you have denied, for all these things again are, is ideas or symbols within you, none of which can destroy you, none of which can have any negative effect on you, no matter how overwhelmingly negative they seem if you simply choose to assume and maintain the positive perspective.

We had, at the end of the last interaction, made a simple suggestion, we will repeat it before proceeding to the exchange.

Whenever you are proceeding and find yourself, perhaps, after deciding to create a life of positivity, functioning from seemingly the old negative perspective, first of all, that's alright. You are simply having an attitude. You are simply having an interpretation. If you stop at that point and do not act, you can mull it over as long as you wish.

Our simple, simple, simple suggestion is that before you act, again, you can roll this around as much as you want — you can cry, you can be miserable, you can fully explore the negative perspective of “this is happening to me” — but — before you act, at least from your positive perspective, which now exists within you just as well, provide one alternative.

See, in your imagination, in your specifically aligned tool that you can never lose, see the preferred you. State the belief of that preferred you. Feel how it feels, not the negative old you, but the preferred new you. When you feel that feeling, then, in your imagination, hand the situation over to the new preferred you. See how that new preferred you handles it. See what they do. See how they act. Then, you have two choices. The, shall we say, automatic negative choice, but also now, having emotionally reattached and re-summoned up your referential, preferential you, two sets of actions.

And, we suggest that, are you to lie both these sets of actions down on the table, you will, perhaps, every time, have no difficulty choosing the actions of the preferred you. So, obvious will it be that those actions are more representative of who you choose to be. And, you get to be who you choose to be, if you say so.

One of the only things that allows you to do this, that allows you to maintain enough of a centered frame of mind to do so, is your willingness, when an old tendency seems to come along, rather than saying, “There I go again, oh, I have failed all my metaphysical training down the drain.” — you can simply substitute these two words, ‘so what’?

So what? Here is one idea. It is not an idea that I prefer. Therefore, I need not judge myself for having come up with it. Presenting as many options as I will gives me that many more choices. So what? I thought that, as you say, big deal.

Now, I will summon the referential, preferential me. I will now see how that me would act. I will lay them side by side. If the miserable alternative looks more appealing, I can still do it. I haven't lost it. But, now I will be acting as a creator and have used the fact that I had that tendency, quote unquote, to my advantage.

When we say, use your creations, we mean them all. And, this will also be your creation of self-invalidation and judgment, for that paralyzes you. That nips your ability in the bud, so to speak, to do anything about it.

But, the moment you simply, instead of saying, “Oh, dumb me”, say, “So what? Is this what I intend to do? Is this representative of who I am now? No.”

It will be obvious to you that that has been of service to you by simply reminding you, in no uncertain terms, who you prefer to be. Perhaps by giving you an example of who you do not prefer to be, but that is one way to do it. And, you can use that as well.

Therefore, in recollecting the many separations within you that you have created in the form of denial, have a good time. For, you literally can start right now to have a good time, rather than assuming that when you do this, this and that, you will be where you wish to be, which sets up the time, by separating that idea from where you are right here, right now.

You can simply be that right now. One unit, no space, therefore, not the necessity for time. Understand, when you exist, you exist right now, and never was there a moment in your life when you would not or could not say, it is right now.

That one moment, in a sense, is the spark itself. As you begin to speak about ‘a past’ having a hold on ‘the present’, that is a separation, and the further back that separation is in your estimation, the more time you need to create in order to walk all those steps.

So, therefore, the present need not be considered a result of the past in an experiential way.

The moment you let go of the separation of the past — which you recreate in the present —the moment you let go of where you will be — which is not where you are — a separation from where you are, that, in and of itself, will change your perception of time. That, in and of itself, will seem to accelerate everything to the point where right now is where you experience it.

You simply need to decide, if you wish, “Right now, I am who I prefer to be, right now!” And from this point forward, simply, when something comes up that seems to be a representation of an older, unpreferred version of you, simply look at some of the things that we have shared, for you will find, if you do so — we don't insist that you do — that it will come in handy, and you will, from this moment forward, not become who you wish to be, but simply, in deciding, BE, be who you wish to be, right now, which is the only time there is.

Before we proceed to the interaction, allow us to share that in your society, in your, shall we say, relative proximity, you have had the occurrence of what you have called ‘bad weather’, and there has been, perhaps, some destruction, though minimal loss of life, which is noteworthy of many ideas within that bad weather.

Allow us to share that, as you begin to live, right here, right now, and understand that your past has been a recreation from the present of that past, and not even generally a precise recreation, by the way, that as you let go of that past, you give yourself the opportunity to be right here, right now, with no distractions and no self-imposed separations.

Therefore, in that this is the transformational age, and many, many, many, individuals will begin to see their power, will begin to understand that they function from the moment, will, perhaps in not understanding much of this consciously, in many different ways if they are unwilling to do so, force themselves to let go of that past.

Therefore, you will find in, shall we say, the rubble, so to speak, of what has occurred from your weather patterns, that there will have been much the, quote-unquote, loss of personal items. These personal items are, in a sense, the museums of the lives of the individuals, giving them very strong identifications to their past through certain objects, through certain mementos, through certain nostalgic material.

So, therefore, many individuals, simultaneously, thousands, in fact, have, again, unconsciously chosen, in that sense, to force themselves through that symbol to literally obliterate their past.

This, in a sense, although it can, perhaps, from the general perspective of your society, seem like a ‘bummer’, will have the overall effect of allowing those individuals to begin anew. And, the letting go of many of these past ideas, which literally bind you, is one of the liberating ideas. Now, if you are willing, from this point forward, which is the only point there is, to begin to let go of the past as an excuse, consciously, you will then not need to force, through a symbol, yourself, to do so.

Therefore, if you do now begin to do this, and many of you have to a very large degree — we are not taking away from that — but if you continue to do so, you will then not need the symbol to force it upon yourself, as, shall we say, in our perception during the transformation of the next few years, perhaps many, many more individuals will.

Therefore, now that you know the overall reason for the creation of the symbol, you can simply get down to it, as you say, without needing to create the symbol to force you to do so. And, this is true with everything in your closet. For, shall we say, the loudest knocking of the things that you deny the most, that, shall we say, build up enough momentum to force their way to your conscious awareness, very often do so because of your denial, because of your cutting off yourself from yourself, in the manifestation you call dis-ease. For, dis-ease is a symbol which forces you to look at a certain idea, or you die.

Therefore, many individuals will choose to look at the idea in lieu of dying. But, you need not do it that way. And, the more you are willing to acknowledge what you believe within that, the less would be any tendency or reason to create dis-ease. For, all disease is, is again not functioning as an aligned whole being.

And, again, needless to say, when you chop up portions of your conscious awareness and tuck them into different compartments, this is not integrated. Therefore, it's up to you, it always will be.

And, your ability in recollecting this material, to recollect yourself out of choice, out of preference, because you say so, because you know you can only grow and learn, and because you know when that closet is empty, you will be living in ecstatic joy. We assume, in that sense, that this has a certain attraction to you. Therefore, we share it as an option, as everything that we share is for we never insist that what we are saying is better than what you are doing. But, should you choose to find that you are in synchronous alignment with what we are sharing, please take it and please use it. It is an option and will have the effect that we are sharing, should you choose to do it. And, it's up to you.

We thank you for your willingness to co-create this interaction with us this evening of your time. We thank you for your willingness to open the many doors that you create between sections of your consciousness within your particular reality.

We thank you for your willingness to interact with us as equals. And, that equalization is all that is necessary in the gathering of yourself, in the recollection of yourself — understanding that the concepts that you have denied are equal to all other concepts —then, it simply becomes a matter of preference. “Do I prefer it?” And, not a matter of, this is better than that, and everyone knows that. That is separation.

Judgment, the unequal assignment of weight, is separation.

Validation — equal validity and acknowledgement, and then, perhaps deciding if you prefer it or not, but then not invalidating the symbol that you do not prefer — is integration, is understanding that life does not happen to you, it happens through you.

Therefore, in return for this willingness, we ask you now, how may I be of service to you?

Sharing!